What happened before
Johann Peter Salomon smoothens the way
Just like Beethoven violin player Johann Peter Salomon (1745-1815) was born in Bonn and grew up in the
Beethoven-Haus of today. And just like Beethoven 24 years later he was also admitted as a 13 year old to the
Prince-Elector's Bonn Court Chapel. Later Salomon became Concert Master serving Prince Heinrich of Prussia.
Around 1780 he settled in London where he played a major role in musical life until his death. As violin
virtuoso, orchestra director and concert entrepreneur he had much success and also belonged to the founders of
the Philharmonic Society. Together with George Smart and Ferdinand Ries Salomon promoted Beethoven's music in
England. Concerning publishing affairs he later occasionally engaged in correspondence with Beethoven in Vienna.
When Salomon died, Beethoven was very sad: "Salomon's death inflicts pain on me because he was a noble man whom
I remember from my childhood days."
Guest book of the Bonn Reading Society, 1788-1821 Lese- und Erholungsgesellschaft
Bonn
During his successful activity as head hunter Salomon managed to bring the renowned Joseph Haydn from Vienna to
the British centre of music twice, namely in 1791/92 and 1794/95. This achievement is even mentioned on his tomb
slab: "He brought Haydn to England in 1791 and 1794". On the first journey together they passed through his
hometown of Bonn where some of his relatives still lived. On Christmas day in 1790 Beethoven's violin teacher
Franz Anton Ries introduced Joseph Haydn as a guest to the "Lesegesellschaft" (reading society) founded three
years ago. Certainly, Salomon, who on his outward journey had attended the reading society on October 1st in the
company of two guests from London, was there, too. Hence on this occasion Beethoven not only met his future
teacher but also made a first contact with England, although in a less direct way.
Letter from June 28th, 1792
As opposed to the outward journey Salomon was not able to accompany Haydn on his journey back home in 1792. In a
letter to his brother-in-law Geiger in Bonn he expresses his regret: "as much as I wanted I am not able to
accompany dear father Haydn on his way to you, because the matters of my business are calling for my presence in
England [
] Mr. Haydn will tell you the reasons better." The expression "father Haydn" both shows a particular
closeness as well as respect. The letter also says that Salomon purchased the piano extracts of two operas by
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart from Bonn publisher Nikolaus Simrock.
Transformation of the "Military Symphony" for piano trio
Haydn wrote his last twelve symphonies that are still referred to as the "London Symphonies" for Salomon and his
concert series. According to the agreement the composer ceased all rights hereof to Salomon. Salomon then
adapted the pieces for chamber music instrumentation and published them in his own publishing house even before
the first publication of the orchestra part. The transformation of Haydn's "Military Symphony" No. 100 for piano
trio bears Salomon's hand-written name on the cover sheet.
Entry of Christoph von Breuning, October 28th, 1792 Original: Österreichische
Nationalbibliothek, Wien
When Beethoven, thanks to a grant of the Prince-Elector, left Bonn in 1792 like Salomon 27 years ago to take
lessons with Haydn in Vienna, his Bonn friends gave him a "book of memories" filled with good wishes for his
future as a farewell gift. Christoph von Breuning's farewell greeting demonstrates that one assumed Beethoven
would also travel to London: "Look! Long time, my friend, Albion [ancient name for the British Isles] has been
waiting for you, see the shady groves it offers the singer" ("sieh! Es winket Freund lange dir albion / sieh!
den schattigen Hain, den es dem Sänger beut"). When Haydn travelled to London for his second engagement in
1794/95 one wondered if the young Beethoven should accompany his teacher. However, Beethoven remained in Vienna,
and even in the future he would never set his foot on London soil.
Ornamented sheet with Bonn musicians
Another Bonn native, Ferdinand Ries (1784-1838), son of Beethoven's violin teacher Franz Anton Ries (who once was
a pupil of Salomon), followed Beethoven to Vienna in early 1803 and became his piano pupil. A few years later he
travelled around the world as a piano player and settled in London in 1813. After only two years he was named a
director of the Philharmonic Society. Although in this position he was able to regularly promote the
presentation of Beethoven's works in London, he did not manage to bring the composer to London. Out of the seven
Bonn musicians depicted on the ornamented sheet three (Beethoven, Salomon and Ferdinand Ries) significantly
influenced musical life in England in the first third of the 19th century.
Beethoven's relationship to Great Britain
Folk song collector George Thomson
George Thomson (1757-1815), a public servant and passionate folk song collector living in Edinburgh strove to
save the folk melodies of his home country from falling into oblivion. His suggestion directed to Beethoven to
compose six sonatas about Scottish melodies marks the beginning of Beethoven's evident relationship to Britain.
Beethoven's reply letter dated October 5th, 1803 is the composer's first letter across the Channel. Although the
project was never carried out because the parties involved were not able to come to an agreement, a vivid
business contact developed until 1820. At the end of October Beethoven offered the piano variations on the
English folk songs "God save the King" and "Rule Britannia" WoO 78 and 79 for printing. « Je vous envoie ci
joint des Variations sur 2 thêmes anglais, qui sont bien faciles et qui, à ce que j'espère, auront un bons
succès. » With his suggestion Thomson might even have initiated the composition of the variations on this melody
that even people on the Continent knew and cherished. Both pieces were first published in Vienna. Half a year
later Clementi published "God save the King" in London but it took two decades for "Rule Britannia" to be
published by an English publishing house. Beethoven used both melodies again in 1813 for his "Grand Battle
Symphony" op. 91.
Piano variations on "God save the king" (C Major) WoO 78
Piano variations on "Rule Britannia" (D Major) WoO 79
As a result of Beethoven's letter dated November 23rd, 1809 George Thomson drew up the following calculation.
Thomson had offered Beethoven 60 Pounds Sterling (equal to 120 gold ducats) for three quintets and three
sonatas, but the composer demanded the double sum due to the weak exchange rate and the difficult war-induced
situation. For each work category Thomson now earmarked a remuneration of 40 Pounds instead of the offered 30
Pounds (an envelope at the British Library addressed to him shows another calculation on the inside stating 50
Pounds). Thomson calculated that only with 410 and 440 copies sold the costs would be covered. As he considered
the deal too risky, it was never closed.
On the back of the calculation Thomson briefly summarised Beethoven's letter in which the composer also wrote
that he was working on the 43 songs Thomson had sent.
Calculation, January 1810 The British Library
Thomson hoped to increase the folk melodies' popularity by means of a contemporary composition. By adapting the
pieces for piano trio - then popular for making music at home - he wanted to give the British bourgeoisie an
insight into "original" music. He ordered these adaptations from renowned composers such as Joseph Haydn,
Leopold Kozeluch, Ignaz Pleyel and Beethoven. All in all 150 song adaptations by Beethoven of Irish, Welsh and
Scottish songs have been preserved. In September 1809 Thomson had sent Beethoven 43 melodies and explicitly
asked for an easy piano part. He would do so repeatedly in the future. In the mentioned letter dated November
23rd Beethoven pointed out that this was a less pleasant work for an artist but surely a good work for business.
Initially he received three ducats for each adaptation, later on four and then five. He also asked to obtain the
texts in the future, a request Thomson did and could not fulfil. The text is not identical with that of the
original folk songs but Thomson had famous poets such as Robert Burns and Sir Walter Scott write new lines for
the completed adaptations. In July 1810 Beethoven sent the final 53 adaptations each consisting of three copies
(one by himself and two by copyists) to England by various means. Thomson, however, waited in vain. The present
copy was a gift from Beethoven to his pupil Archduke Rudolph. In the summer of 1811 he borrowed it to make a new
one for Thomson. The receipt of this copy was confirmed in early August 1812.
Corrected copy of the 53 folk song adaptations for singing voice, violin,
violoncello and piano, 1810
In 1814 the first of two volumes of the "Irish Songs" and in 1817 the third and last volume of the "Welsh Songs"
with Beethoven's contribution were published. Thomson served as editor and the London music publishing house
Preston printed and marketed the folk song adaptations. The book-friendly folio format editions feature
elaborate copper engravings.
Frontispiece "St. Cecilia" of the 1st volume of the "Irish Songs"
Original edition of the "Welsh Songs", 3rd volume, 1817
Beethoven's relationship to Great Britain
Folk song collector George Thomson
After agreeing on a remuneration of four ducats for each song adaptation in 1814 Beethoven requested a subsequent
payment for three Scottish songs delivered later (Thomson regularly asked Beethoven to facilitate his
compositions). In a letter from March 1818 Beethoven claimed he had only received three ducats instead of the
determined remuneration. Thomson, however, replied that the bill issued by the Fries bank certainly stated 12
ducats. Either Beethoven was mistaking or Fries had written the bill only after Beethoven had asked him to do
so.
Beethoven also mentioned that he had the English texts be translated, thus it can only be pieces that were
already published in the "Irish Songs" or "Welsh Songs". Probably the translations were done for a planned
publication by the Vienna publisher Steiner. Beethoven offered Thomson piano variations on these melodies at a
price of nine ducats each.
Letter to George Thomson dated March 11th, 1818
The fifth and last volume of the "Scottish Songs" series published in 1818 contains apart from Beethoven's 25
Scottish songs op. 108 four songs by Joseph Haydn and the quite popular cantata "The Jolly Beggars" by Robert
Burns with a melody by Henry Rowley Bishop. Beethoven had rejected the composition before. Thomson had asked
both to compose the violin part in such a way that it could also be played with a flute. He hoped this would
increase sales. The sales of Beethoven's song adaptations were far below the sales of the first editions
featuring adaptations by Haydn and Kozeluch. The editor believed Beethoven's complex style was the reason for
the decreased revenue. In his last letter to Thomson from May 1819 Beethoven, now angry at Thomson for his
ongoing request for simplicity, explained that he could not regard this as a criterion and that he hardly found
the courage to call the pieces his own.
Original edition of the "Scottish Songs", 5th volume, 1818
As already mentioned Beethoven, who was quite an adept businessman in using his compositions several times, later
tried to sell the compositions also on the Continent. He did so in Berlin in 1820. Publisher Adolph Martin
Schlesinger showed an interest in the songs and arranged a German edition in 1822. One copy created by two
different copyists, reviewed and corrected by Beethoven, was used for the engraving. Franz Oliva, a friend of
Beethoven and his voluntary secretary, underlaid the English text of the songs. Schlesinger commissioned Samuel
Heinrich Spiker, publisher and librarian of the Berlin Royal University, to translate the text into German for
later addition.
Corrected copy of the Scottish songs for voice, piano, violin and violoncello, op.
108 for the German edition
To facilitate the marketing of the songs on the German market Schlesinger had the edition be printed bilingual in
English and German. Originally, the songs were written in a Scottish dialect, something which did not make
translating them an easy task. Thus, the German translation is not always the best. Beethoven recommended
Schlesinger to commission Carl Friedrich Zelter, a close friend of Goethe, to correct the translation but the
publisher decided in favour of the original translation.
Bilingual edition of the "Scottish Songs" op. 108
During the adaptation of the folk songs Thomson had asked the composer to select a few European folk songs for
adaptations. However, it proved impossible to underlay these with English poetry. In 1818 Thomson commissioned
Beethoven to compose variation cycles for piano with flute on some of these and other subjects that had
partially been published as song adaptations before (op. 105 and op. 107). Displayed are Russian subject
"Beautiful Minka" and the first variation on the Welsh melody "Peggy's Daughter". Beethoven wrote: "for the
subject the flute in 8va plays with the piano but only the melody" ("zum Thema die Flöte in 8va mit dem Klawier
jedoch nur mit der Melodie"), wherever the flute is not mentioned it plays the piano's melody part. The side
remark is from Beethoven's secretary Anton Schindler who dated the handwriting too early: "Side remark: This
composition by Beethoven dates [crossed out: "either"] from 1816. [crossed out: "or 1819"] A. Schindler." ("Nb.
Diese Komposition Beethovens fällt [crossed out: "entweder"] in das Jahr 1816. [crossed out: "oder 1819"] A.
Schindler.")
Autograph of the variations op. 107 No. 6 and 7, subject "Beautiful Minka"
In 1819 Thomson published nine of the delivered piano variations. According to the title 12 were planned
originally. The collection was published in three booklets richly adorned with copper. It contains three Irish,
three Welsh (among them as No. 8 the subject shown above), one Scottish, one Austrian and one Russian subject
("Beautiful Minka" as No. 7).
Variation subjects for piano and flute, 1819
Beethoven's relationship to Great Britain
Composer and publisher Muzio Clementi
Muzio Clementi (1752-1832)
Already at the age of thirteen, Muzio Clementi, born in Rome in 1752, was "bought" for seven years by an English
traveller who noticed Clementi's exceptional talent as organ and harpsichord player, and spent this time on an
English country estate, deeply involved in studies. Since 1774 he lived in London where he performed stirring
piano sonatas in concerts, something still quite unusual at that time. In the following years he made himself a
name in the London musical life as piano player and teacher. In the early 1780s Clementi went on a long concert
journey through Europe. Later he also worked as a music publisher and piano manufacturer. In 1798 the famous
piano factory "Longman & Broderip" was renamed to "Clementi & Co.". With Clementi as director the company not
only built pianos but also published works written by all famous musicians of that time. When the Philharmonic
Society was founded in 1813 Clementi was named one of the six directors and often took part in their concerts
with great passion.
Cadenzas for piano concerts, composed in the style of famous composers, André,
Offenbach 1787
The cadenzas, composed according to the style of renowned composers Joseph Haydn, Leopold Kozeluch, Wolfgang
Amadeus Mozart, Franz Xaver Sterkel and Johann Baptist Vanhal and complemented by an individual one, represent a
type of musical anthology that should clearly demonstrate Clementi's knowledge of the works of his fellow
composers as well as his own musical flexibility. On Christmas Eve of 1782 Clementi competed with Mozart in a
musical competition in the presence of Emperor Joseph II and the Russian Tsar Paul I without suffering any
damages to his name. At that time cadenzas were only noted and printed with exceptions. Hence, the collection is
of historical relevance as it shows the rewritten form canon that served as a pattern for cadenzas. Beethoven
with his very individual, if not to say revolutionary cadenzas would have quickly shown any contemporary
imitating this style his limits.
Three piano sonatas op. 25
The sonatas op. 25 were published in 1804 as "10. Suite du Répertoire des Clavecinistes", a series edited by the
Zurich publishing composer Johann Georg Nägeli. The ensuing 11th delivery then contained Beethoven's sonata
"Pathétique" op. 13 and the first print of the sonata in E flat Major op. 31 No. 3. From a publisher's point of
view, Clementi and Beethoven were then on a comparable level. In his piano sonatas the elder now and then
elaborated on approaches for the future which the younger must have studied with attention during his first
years in Vienna. Later Clementi self-confidently added a selection from his over fifty year long working life to
the fairly well-known piano study programme with the sophisticated title of "Gradus ad Parnassum, or The Art of
Playing on the Piano".
Ludwig van Beethoven, septet op. 20 in a string quintet adaptation
The copy is a later edition of the reprint by Clementi, Banger, Hyde, Collard & Davis dated 1807. The septet's
original edition was published by the Franz Anton Hoffmeister publishing house in Vienna and Leipzig in 1802. In
an announcement in the Vienna newspaper Beethoven explicitly wrote that only the publisher was responsible for
the transformation into a smaller instrumentation deemed only for string instruments. The visible plate cracks
on the title page, a sign of wear, prove that many copies of this edition were printed which in turn proves that
the quintet was also very popular in England.
From 1802 until 1810 Clementi went on a long journey to the Continent, selling his own and other works to
publishers and accepting the works of other composers for publishing purposes. In April 1807 he met Beethoven in
Vienna. In a letter to his business partner Collard he described the meeting: According to Clementi, Beethoven
started grinning at Clementi in public places. Of course, he tried hard not to discourage the young composer.
Finally, he was able to conquer the "haughty beauty Beethoven", a term that may be interpreted in various ways
and encompasses various meanings from "proud" to "noble" to "uppish". When Clementi first visited Beethoven at
his place, he effusively praised some of his compositions and was able finally to conclude an agreement covering
the following pieces: the 4th piano concert op. 58, the three string quartets op. 59, the 4th symphony op. 60,
the violin concert op. 61 and an adaptation of the piano concert as well as the "Coriolan" overture op. 62.
Beethoven received 200 Pounds. However, only the string quartets and the violin concert, i.e. the adaptation
thereof which Clementi had suggested himself, were later printed. Although Beethoven gave notice when the Vienna
editions were published to facilitate the simultaneous edition of the English editions, those were printed with
a delay of two years.
Piano version of the violin concert (D Major) op. 61 Royal College of Music, London
The piano version Beethoven - possibly with the support of an assistant - drew up on Clementi's request was
published at the same time as the original version. Today, only one single copy remains and is now in possession
of the Royal College of Music in London. In the field of concerts the piano version did not gain any relevance.
Its purpose is more of a "second use", stemming from material expectations rather than artistic beliefs. In any
case Beethoven wrote the piano version "for" piano player Clementi and not for use within his own concerts.
In 1810/11 Beethoven's operas 73 to 82 were published as "first" original editions. All were published shortly
before the German parallel editions by Breitkopf & Härtel. The string quartet op. 74 was edited two months
earlier. The title cover explicitly mentions the other Beethoven editions published only a short time before:
"Where may be had just Published by the above Author, A Concerto / for the Piano Forte. Two Sonatas, for Do.
Thema, with Variations for Do. / A Fantasia for Do. and a Concerto for the Violin." Meant here are the piano
versions of the violin concert op. 61, the piano sonatas op. 78 and 79, the piano variations op. 76, the piano
fantasy op. 77 and the original version of the violin concert. Here, the string quartet is labelled with opus
number 62 because Clementi continued counting from his last Beethoven edition. The piano sonatas were then
published as op. 63, the piano concert op. 73 as op. 64 and the choir fantasy op. 80 as op. 65. The other
editions did not have an opus number.
String quartet (E flat Major) op. 74
Composer and publisher Muzio Clementi
Piano version of the violin concerto (D Major) op. 61
One copy of the piano version encouraged by Clementi and thoroughly revised by Beethoven still exists. The
composer corrected notes, added dynamic symbols, legato arches, pedal and performance instructions such as
"dolce" and "pizz[icato]", missing clefs, pauses etc. The solo part shows signs of scraping. Many corrections
are indicated with a little cross on the margin.
Copyist's score of the piano version of the violin concerto (D Major) op. 61
corrected by the composer
The British Library
During the piano transformation Beethoven also reviewed the part of the solo violin between May and June 1807.
The piano and orchestra version was printed in August 1808 and as such three months later than the "original
version" for violin and orchestra. Whereas the piano version probably never would have been created without the
suggestion of the English publishing house, the London edition was published only after two years.
Piano version of the violin concerto (D Major) op. 61
Whereas only one copyist's score corrected by Beethoven of the adaptation remains, original cadenzas written by
him for this concerto have been preserved. Displayed is the cadenza for the first movement. Not only for the
length is it rather unusual - 12 handwritten pages! A second manuscript, a part for timpani, was added to the
piano part. To accompany the solo piano part with a timpani when playing the cadenza is something unheard of in
piano literature (until Alexander Glasunow did it again many decades later). Already at the beginning of the
concerto the timpani have a prominent function: with four strikers it opens the musical event. Maybe Beethoven
wanted to strengthen and confirm this role in the cadenza. In the past, the handwritten cadenza was part of the
musical collection of Beethoven's pupil Archduke Rudolph of Austria, a good piano player.
Beethoven's own cadenza, piano part
Beethoven's own cadenza, kettledrum part
Beethoven's relationship to Great Britain
Publisher Robert Birchall
After having sold a total of 13 works to the Vienna publisher Sigmund Anton Steiner in early 1815, Beethoven
tried to arrange for a parallel English edition for these pieces, too. A request directed to Sir George Smart in
this matter remained unanswered. Two and a half months later Beethoven offered the compositions to Johann Peter
Salomon in order to bring them to an English publisher (both letters are shown on the following pages). Salomon
managed to sell at least four pieces: For 130 Dutch gold ducats London publisher Robert Birchall bought the
violin sonata op. 96, the "Archduke Trio" op. 97 and the piano extracts of the Seventh Symphony op. 92 and of
the "Grand Battle Symphony" op. 91. Beethoven's former pupil and friend Ferdinand Ries who spent ten years of
his life in London, carried out the corrections for Birchall and settled further details between composer and
publisher such as publication dates.
Letter to Ferdinand Ries in London, February 28th, 1816
In the meantime Beethoven had sent all four compositions to London and now requested the publisher to reimburse
him the costs for copying and postage in addition to his payment. ("It is very little for an Englishman but a
lot more for a poor Austrian musician!"). On February 10th he sent Ries a detailed bill stating additional
expenses of ten ducats. Besides, he expressed his sorrows about Salomon's death for whom Ries served as executor
of his will: "Salomon's death inflicts pain on me because he was a noble man whom I remember from my childhood
days."
Ferdinand Ries (1784-1838)
In 1824 Ries returned to the Rhineland. Shortly before, this portrait was created and published in the English
music magazine "The Harmonicon". Ries gave it to his old Bonn friend Franz Gerhard Wegeler (1865-1848) as a gift
and added the following handwritten dedication: "to my friend Wegeler Ferd: Ries" ("meinem Freunde Wegeler Ferd:
Ries"). The title quote of the exhibition "Where your compositions are preferred to any other" was taken from a
letter from Ferdinand Ries to Beethoven.
Summary of ownership and receipt for Robert Birchall, March 9th, 1816
With the confirmation of ownership Beethoven ceased the rights of ownership and publishing for the UK and Ireland
of the mentioned compositions to the publisher and obliged himself to delay the publication in other countries
until after the pieces had been published in Britain. The compositions are individually listed with incipit,
dedicatee and opus number (the Seventh Symphony wrongly named op. 98). The simultaneous publication on the
Continent and in Britain should protect any publisher from financial damages caused by unauthorised reprints.
Nevertheless, the Vienna publishing house Steiner published the violin sonata already in July 1816 whereas
Birchall published the English edition three months later in October. In case of opus 91 Birchall was ahead of
Steiner by two months. Also the piano extract of the Seventh Symphony was first published in Vienna and two
months later in London in January 1817. Obviously, Beethoven never succeeded in giving London exact publication
dates.
Although the composer must have received his remuneration at the latest in early May, he did not send the signed
document to Johann von Häring who took care of his English correspondence to be forwarded to England until
September 1816.
Letter concept from Christopher Lonsdale to Beethoven, November 8th, 1816
Birchall's employee Christopher Lonsdale expresses his contentment with the payment now being complete. Before,
he had asked Beethoven to indicate one remuneration sum including all expenses. Lonsdale repeatedly reminded the
composer of the ownership confirmation and supposed that Beethoven would not sign the document until he received
his additional claim. According to the receipt Beethoven had been reimbursed on August 3rd. On September 9th he
had also given Peter Joseph Simrock who visited him in Baden the property confirmation along with a short letter
addressed to Johann von Häring to be forwarded to London. Obviously the further delay was the fault of the
banks. Birchall had continued to commission Beethoven for adaptations of folk songs for violin or cello
accompaniment, however, he considered the remuneration of 30 Pounds requested by Beethoven as exaggerated. With
a reference to Birchall's bad health other offers (piano sonata op. 101 and a never completed piano trio in F
Major) were refused. The cooperation stopped. As late as December 1816 did Birchall publish the English original
edition of the trio. Hence, the Vienna original edition was again ahead by three months.
Trio for piano, violin, violoncello (B flat Major) op. 97
Ferdinand Ries should also offer the variations on a march by Anton Diabelli (C Major) op. 120 for publication in
England. On April 25th, 1823 Beethoven made the following announcement: "In a few weeks you will also receive 33
new variations on a subject (Waltz opus 120), dedicated to your wife." The corrected copy is the promised
manuscript. Beethoven himself wrote a dedication and the date on the title: "33 variations on a waltz dedicated
to the wife of my dear friend Ries by Ludwig van Beethoven Vienna, April 30th 1823". The English edition was
never published as Ries tells in his Beethoven memories: "Because Beethoven had delayed the sending so long and
had forgotten all about the commission, that when I brought Boosey [the London publishing house interested in
publishing the composition] the variations, we (
) found out it had already been published in Vienna (
) with a
dedication to Madam Brentano".
Title page written by Beethoven of the corrected copy of the Diabelli variations op.
120
Publisher Robert Birchall
The "Grand Battle Symphony" op. 91
In June 1813 the troops of Sir Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, defeated Napoleon at the Vitoria plain in
northern Spain. Inventor and music mechanic Johann Nepomuk Mälzel (he also built the hearing tubes for
Beethoven) convinced the composer of his idea to put the defeat of the French to music. Originally intended for
Mälzel's new musical device, the so-called "Panharmonicon", the composition was too powerful to be transferred
to a mechanical musical machine. Beethoven then arranged the composition for orchestra and added a piece of
battle music (with the marches "Rule Britannia" and "Marlborough") and an intrada. As a composition written on a
special occasion it matched the current taste and was met with great success in December 1813. Thereafter, the
piece was performed many times in Vienna. Beethoven dedicated the composition to the prince-regent and later
king of England George IV who governed the country since 1811 because his father had become insane. Already in
early 1814 had Beethoven sent the score copy to the dedicatee but neither received an answer nor the expected
remuneration. Instead, the composition was performed in London on February 10th, 1815, a first presentation that
should be followed by many successful performances. The topic was reported effusively in the newspapers so that
Beethoven who spoke French but not English asked Johann von Häring to write to conductor George Smart. Both were
pleased with the great success the battle music had in London. However, Beethoven asked the conductor for advice
because he did not want to publish the piano extract without the dedicatee's permission. In addition, he offered
Smart other compositions for English publishers. In the end Beethoven thanked Smart for his efforts dedicated to
his "children" (i. e. his compositions).
Letter to George Smart in London, March 16th and 19th, 1815
The announcement for the English first performance under Sir George Smart at the Theatre Royal Drury Lane on
February 10th, 1815 explicitly mentioned the great success the composition had in Vienna: "Between the 2nd and
3rd Parts will be introduced, fort he 1st time in our Country, A Grand Battle Sinfonia. Composed by Beethoven.
And performed with unbounded Applause at Vienna." The announcement for the second presentation in London a few
days later bore the following remark about the success of the previous performance: "Which was performed, for
the first time, on Friday last, with universal Acclamations of Applause, and unanimously encored", that means
with continuously growing public acclaim. Until May the piece was performed over and over again while the
euphoria of the audience steadily increased. In the following year the orchestra counted 200 musicians. Until
November 1817, when Princess Charlotte died, the piece was part of almost any concert performed here.
Beethoven's oratorio "Christ on the mount of olives" op. 85 was also presented at this theatre for the first
time in England in February 1814 and repeated several times.
Announcements for performances of op. 91 at the Theatre Royal Drury Lane
The British Library
Announcement for the performance at King's Theatre on June 23, 1830
The British Library
The scenic performance on June 23, 1830 at King's Theatre in the Haymarket must have been quite noteworthy when
apart from stage setting, costumes and other decoration a troup of horses was shown on stage.
Publisher Robert Birchall
The "Grand Battle Symphony" op. 91
George Augustus Frederick, Prince-Regent and later King of England (1762-1830)
Letter to Johann Peter Salomon in London, June 1st, 1815
The address written by someone else reads: "Vienna / Mr. Salomon / most renowned virtuoso in / the service of His
Royal / Highness the Prince Regent / London / Newman street, Oxford street / no. 70." A few months after the
letter to Smart Beethoven asked Johann Peter Salomon if he saw a chance to have the Prince-Regent at least
reimburse him for the costs for copying the battle symphony. Apart from that he had heard a piano reduction was
being prepared which would violate his rights and remuneration as author (in fact this was not the case and
Beethoven had already sold the composition for Austria to Steiner). Although he tried several times to remind
the English king of this neglect, Beethoven never received any acknowledgement for the dedication. After having
sent the king a printed copy of the score many years later, Beethoven once more asked the renowned London harp
manufacturer Johann Andreas Stumpff for help in 1825 but also his efforts were in vain. Stumpff replied: "I have
made many inquiries with even the ones closest to the king in relation to the Battle at Victoria but have heard
no more than one would regret not being able to help in this matter and that Sir Benj. Bloomfield, then director
of the musical department, who might have received the composition, was no more in London but at the Swedish
court as an envoy for many years and that possibly with favourable luck one might remind the king in this
matter."
English original edition of the piano reduction op. 91
German original edition of the piano reduction op. 91
The planned simultaneous edition by Steiner in Vienna and Birchall in London failed in this case, too. Beethoven
had asked the Vienna publisher to delay the edition because he needed to find an English publishing house first.
At the end of November 1815 he told Ries the title of the English edition and asked for the publication date. In
December Ries confirmed receipt of the scores. Beethoven was told that there would be a delay of three to four
months which Beethoven then indicated to Steiner. Nevertheless, the English edition was published within a month
in January 1816 and thus two months earlier than the German edition.
Beethoven's relationship to Great Britain
Other publishing houses
Two Italian musicians working in London, Francesco Cianchettini and cello player Sperati, referring to themselves
as "Importers of Classical Music" on the title page, published a series of 27 symphonies in score editions each
month between 1807 and 1809. Apart from 18 symphonies by Joseph Haydn and six pieces by Mozart Beethoven's first
three symphonies were published here as score editions for the first time, a score type that would not be common
on the Continent until the 1820s. The first edition in voices, published in 1804 by a Vienna publisher, served
as master. Probably, Beethoven did not know anything about this edition and did not receive any remuneration.
Neither was it Beethoven who dedicated the composition to Prince-Regent George of England but the
publishers.
First score edition of the Second Symphony op. 36, Cianchettini & Sperati, London
1808
The displayed catalogue excerpt shows that the London music publishing house Preston also edited a number of
reprints besides the folk song adaptations published by George Thomson.
Catalogue of the Beethoven compositions published by Preston, 1823
The British Library
Between 1808 and 1820 the London publisher Monzani & Hill edited a monumental full edition of Beethoven's piano
and piano chamber music compositions - enough sheet music to fill 75 volumes. All publications were reprints. Of
booklet 27 only one single copy remains, kept at the Beethoven-Haus for a few years. It contains the variations
in G Major WoO 77 that were first published by a Vienna publisher in 1800.
Six easy variations for piano on a proper subject (G Major) WoO 77, Monzani & Hill,
London approx. 1813
Beethoven's relationship to Britain
Piano manufacturer Thomas Broadwood
Piano forte by Thomas Broadwood, 1817
Thomas Broadwood, the most productive piano manufacturer of that time in London, gave Beethoven a piano forte in
1817. For this purpose he had invited five of the most important London musicians to his shop to choose a
suitable instrument for the cherished master. Above the company label on the front edge of the pin block the
following text can be read: "Hoc Instrumentum est Thomae Broadwood (Londrini) donum propter ingenium
illustrissime Beethoven." [This instrument is a proper gift from Thomas Broadwood of London to the great
Beethoven.] Next to it Friedrich Kalbrenner, Ferdinand Ries, Johann Baptist Cramer, Jacques-Godefroi Ferrari and
Charles Knyvett signed the instrument. Many years later the Vienna music publisher Carl Anton Spina gave the
piano to Franz Liszt who then dedicated it to the Hungarian National Museum. The displayed instrument,
constructed in the same way, is owned by the Beethoven-Haus.
Letter to Count Moritz von Lichnowsky, early February 1818
Broadwood notified Beethoven in early January 1818 that the instrument had been dispatched on December 27th.
Beethoven immediately contacted Count Moritz Lichnowsky and asked him to speak with the finance minister on his
behalf so that he would be allowed to obtain the instrument free of custom fees and other charges. As can be
seen from the article published in the Vienna newspaper on June 8th Beethoven's wish was granted: "Mister Ludwig
van Beethoven, cherished not only in Austria but also abroad for his great musical genius, received a rare and
precious piano forte from a London admirer as a gift, delivered to Vienna free of charge. With particular
generosity the court chamber of the dual monarchy dispensed with custom fees that are usually applied to foreign
musical instruments, and hence proved in a way pleasant for the arts that one strives to encourage such seldom
merits of genius by humane appreciation."
Beethoven effusively thanked the authorities for the "honourable gift": "I will regard it as an altar on which I
will offer to god Apollo my most beautiful sacrifices of spirit."
The Philharmonic Society
The Ninth Symphony
The Philharmonic Society, founded in London in 1813, became Beethoven's most important institutional partner in
England. The mission of the society, mostly based on private initiative, was to hold concerts on the highest
professional level. Many people of importance to Beethoven held relevant positions: The often mentioned
musicians Sir George Smart and Ferdinand Ries belonged to the group of directors, and piano and cello player as
well as composer Neate was one of the founding fathers. The first concerts each had a composition of Beethoven
as the core. In most cases this was a symphony or other composition such as the popular septet op. 20 or the
quintet op. 29. The mixed concert programme typical of that time also featured compositions by Cherubini,
Mozart, Haydn and Boccherini. In 1815 the Philharmonic Society bought three pieces from the work series
Beethoven had offered to Smart and Salomon for publication in England: The overtures for "The ruins of Athens"
("Die Ruinen von Athen") op. 113 and "King Stephan" ("König Stephan") op. 117 and the "Name Day Overture" ("Zur
Namensfeier") op. 115. In the same year Neate stayed in Vienna where he visited Beethoven. When he left for
London in February 1816 he took several compositions to present them in the concerts of the Philharmonic Society
and/or offer them to London publishers. Beethoven also hoped for a beneficiary concert to his avail.
Unfortunately, he was disappointed and felt betrayed after he had not heard anything from Neate for months but
had read about a successful performance of his symphony in London in the press. It cannot be said for sure if
the symphony presented was indeed the new Seventh Symphony or the often performed Fifth Symphony.
In the following year the Philharmonic Society invited Beethoven to London. "We would like to have you
with us here in London next winter", wrote Ferdinand Ries on June 9th, 1817. The flattering introduction reads
as follows: "The Philharmonic Society where your compositions are preferred to any other wishes to give you
proof of its admiration and gratitude for the many wonderful moments we were able to enjoy thanks to your
exceptional compositions of genius." The society was willing to pay Beethoven 300 guineas for a season-long stay
in London and for the compositions of two symphonies that should then be the property of the Society. During his
stay he would be able to give other concerts on his own which would be a nice source of additional income.
Beethoven requested an additional minimum remuneration of 100 guineas to cover his travel costs that might be
higher because of a necessary travel companion. The Society refused his request and the journey never took
place, certainly also due to Beethoven's bad state of health and the concerns for his nephew.
Still, Beethoven intended to visit England and told Ries in 1822 in a letter: "I am still playing with
the thought to come to London, if only my health permitting; possibly next spring?" On this occasion he also
asked Ries the following: "What remuneration would the Harmonic Society give me for a great symphony?" Ries
forwarded the composer's inquiry and in the first session of the season in 1823 the directors decided in favour
of Beethoven:
"10. November 1822
Resolved that an offer of £ 50 be made to Beethoven for a M[anu].S[cript].Sym[phony]. He having
permission to dispose of it at the expiration of Eighteen Months after the receipt of it. It being a proviso
that it shall arrive during the Month of March next."
According to the minutes a remuneration of £ 50 was offered to Beethoven for a new and yet unprinted
symphony, given that the manuscript would be received in the month of March. Beethoven would then (as opposed to
the offer of 1817) have the full rights of the composition after 18 months. Ries informed Beethoven of the
decision five days later.
Minute book of the board of the Philharmonic Society, 1822 to 1837, entry from
November 10th, 1822
The British Library
In early 1823 the Philharmonic Society also bought the overture "Consecration of the house" ("Die Weihe des
Hauses") op. 124 for £ 25. A copy was delivered by the London envoy secretary Caspar Bauer. In the end of
February he notified Neate to send the symphony the same way as soon as he would receive the remuneration. At
that time op. 125 had only been sketched and composed partially. Apart from that Beethoven expressed his hope to
be able to visit London next year when he felt better: "England I would like to see and all the wonderful
artists there. For me it would be of favourable as I can never achieve anything in Germany."
Letter to Charles Neate dated February 25th, 1823
The completion of the symphony was delayed. In several letters from 1823 to Ries Beethoven over and over again
gave new excuses. In the beginning of September he promised messenger Franz Christian Kirchhoffer, employee at
the Vienna bank Hofmann & Goldstein, to deliver the manuscript within the next two weeks. As can be seen from
the receipt, Kirchhoffer had to wait for almost another eight months.
Receipt signed by Beethoven, April 27th, 1824
The British Library
Neate confirmed receipt of the score eight moths later on December 20th, 1824. The copy corrected by Beethoven
bears the following title written by the composer: "Great symphony written for the Philharmonic Society in
London.- by Ludwig van Beethoven First movement". The final part shows the handwritten German original text. An
English and (incomplete, partially free) Italian translation was added in London. Schiller's "Ode to Joy" was
performed in this language, particularly suitable for singing.
Copyist´s score of the Ninth Symphony corrected by the composer, 1824
The British Library
The Philharmonic Society
The Ninth Symphony
Charles Neate once more invited Beethoven to London for the season of 1825 to conduct the first performance of
the Ninth Symphony. For a remuneration of 300 guineas he should bring two new compositions, another symphony and
a concert to first performance. Apart from that he would be able to give a concert for his own benefit.
Obviously, the scope of Beethoven's impaired hearing was unknown in London. Beethoven asked for the remuneration
to be increased by 100 guineas, a request that was refused. However, Neate is sure that Beethoven will be
completely content with his stay in England. Like before Beethoven did not undertake the journey. With the
letter the composer enclosed a list of mistakes concerning the Ninth Symphony drawn up by a copyist but pointed
out that these mistakes were found in other copies and needed not necessarily show up in the London copy, too.
Later, Neate said that the London copy was flawless.
List of mistakes for the Ninth Symphony, January 27th, 1825
At the first attempt the Philharmonic Society did not manage to perform the composition in a way that met its
requirements. The extremely popular double-bass player Domenico Dragonetti was scheduled for the bass
recitatives as a solo player for which he requested an additional remuneration. The Society refused this. In a
letter to the secretary he wrote that he even would have requested the double had he known the score before. A
public rehearsal on February 1st first became a musical and then a press catastrophe and significantly
influenced the review of the regular performance on March 21st, 1825. For the critics the piece was too long and
too difficult. Sir George Smart, a conscientious conductor and artist, had explicitly asked the directors of the
Philharmonic Society to delay the presentation until it was clear if Beethoven came to London to "partake in the
performance" (as it was wisely described during the Vienna first performance) despite his hearing impairment
that might be underestimated in London and until questions had been answered such as the right time for the bass
recitatives in the fourth movement. Urged by Beethoven's Vienna friends and as opposed to the agreement with the
Philharmonic Society the symphony had already been presented for the first time almost a year earlier in Vienna
on May 7th, 1824, and had been met with great success. As late as ten years after the English first performance
the composition gained success in London. The Academy presented the choir finale separately at the Hanover
Square Rooms; this time with an English translation by conductor Charles Lucas. Now the audience understood the
meaning. Another two years later the Philharmonic Society also managed to hold a successful presentation under
Ignaz Moscheles that then led to the suggestion to perform the composition every year with a choir of 1,000
members and an orchestra of 500 musicians as apotheosis and great European freemason anthem. In 1927 the
suggestion was carried out, even if in a different way. The Strasbourg Council of Ministers of the European
Community chose a part of the choir finale in a plain instrumental version as European anthem.
Programme of the English first performance of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony on March
21st, 1825 with handwritten notes by George Smart
The British Library
Half a year after the presentation Sir George Smart travelled to Vienna and met Beethoven several times in Vienna
and Baden.
Sir George Thomas Smart (1776-1876)
BOn the occasion of a final visit on September 16th Smart gave the admired composer a diamond pin. In gratitude
Beethoven composed the canon "Ars longa, vita brevis" WoO 192. Smart later noted in his diary "as quickly as his
feather pen was willing to write, within about two minutes". The dedication written by Beethoven reads:
"Geschrieben am 16ten September 1825 in Baden, als mich mein lieber talentvoller Musikkünstler u. Freund Smart
(aus England) allhier besuchte. Ludwig van Beethoven" ("Written in Baden on September 16th, 1825 when my dear
and talented music artist and friend Smart (from England) visited me here. Ludwig van Beethoven").
Canon "Ars longa, vita brevis"
The British Library
The Philharmonic Society
The money gift
In February 1827 the already fatally ill Beethoven contacted his old acquaintance Ignaz Moscheles to ask for
financial help. George Smart and Johann Andreas Stumpff received similar letters. In earlier years the
Philharmonic Society had been in correspondence with Beethoven several times concerning a concert for his own
avail. Now Beethoven, who had already been unable to work for months, felt himself in the situation to ask for
such a concert. As weak as he was, he had to dictate the letter. Only the signature later cut out by Moscheles
was written by his hand.
Letter to Ignaz Moscheles dated February 22nd, 1827
In 1808 piano player, composer and conductor Ignaz Moscheles, originally from Prague, came to Vienna. Until 1820
he was part of Beethoven's circle of acquaintance. From the early 1820s until 1846 Moscheles lived in London but
remained in written contact with Beethoven.
Ignaz Moscheles (1794-1870)
Thuringian harp manufacturer Johann Andreas Stumpff was a fervent admirer of Beethoven. In the autumn of 1824 he
had visited Beethoven in Baden and remembered the visit in a preserved draft for a letter: "Still my loving
heart is grateful for the fortuity that led me to lovely Baden and see face to face the most favourite of the
muses and creator of the most eminent melodies ever created by the human spirit and who so kindly received me
with such generosity that I will strive to earn all my life long." In the following year he particularly pleased
the "greatest living musician Luis v. Beethoven" with the gift of a 42-volume full edition of the works by Georg
Friedrich Händel.
After Beethoven's letter for help arrived in London the board of the Philharmonic Society immediately held a
session and granted the composer's wish. The generous sum of £ 100 was quickly sent to Vienna. It was a noble
deed by the Society for which Beethoven had not always been a reliable partner but still a highly appreciated
artist. The day Beethoven was buried, which he, of course, did not know yet, Moscheles revealed to the Society
the content of the letter his friend Sebastian Rau had written him. In the letter Rau described the tremendous
joy Beethoven had expressed when he brought him the money gift the Society had sent. In fact, it was Beethoven's
last great feeling of joy and it also improved the state of his health for a short time.
Sebastian Rau to Ignaz Moscheles, March 17th, 1827
On March 28th Sebastian Rau informed London of Beethoven's death. To Moscheles he wrote: "Beethoven is gone, he
died on March 26th in the evening between 5 and 6 o'clock, bitterly struggling with death and in terrible
suffering. But he had lost consciousness the day before." Vienna piano manufacturer Johann Baptist Streicher
sent a letter with the same date and similar content to Johann Andreas Stumpff. In 1822 Streicher had undertaken
a long study journey and had become friends with Stumpff in London.
Beethoven on his deathbed, March 1827, drawing by Teltscher (1801-1837)
Josef Teltscher obviously visited Beethoven several times in March 1827 to draw him. According to the reports of
Anselm Hüttenbrenner and Johann Baptist Jenger it is quite certain that he was also present in Beethoven's
living room in the afternoon of March 26th when the composer died. From the way Beethoven is drawn it can be
assumed that he was still alive, yet unconscious, when Teltscher drew him.
Epilogue
Aftereffects on the Island and Continent
Joseph Joachim (1831-1907)
Charles Hallé (1819-1895)
Already as a young man did Joseph Joachim begin his musical studies in Vienna with Joseph Böhm (1795-1876), who
still had known Ludwig van Beethoven in person and participated, among others, in the first performance of the
Ninth Symphony. Through his teacher Joachim hence had a link to the authentic interpretation of the compositions
by his admired composer. In 1844, at an age of only 13 years, he had his first public appearance as a solo
player in the violin concert under Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy. His performance was widely acclaimed. Since then
he was regarded as THE interpreter of this composition for which he also composed two cadenzas of his own. Later
Joachim became the grey eminence of the German musical life and was, amongst others, honorary president of the
Beethoven-Haus. In this position he initiated the Bonn chamber music festival tradition. It was him and his
quartet who made Beethoven's late string quartets known to the general public by interpretations his
contemporaries considered unrivalled.
Karl Halle, born in Halle/Westphalia, was quite an influential figure for the English musical life of the 19th
century. He early settled in London and presented Beethoven's piano sonatas first in concerts held at home, then
in public concerts. In Manchester he later founded an orchestra named after him that became known for exemplary
performances.
Signature of Queen Victoria of England on the deed of foundation of the Bonn
Beethoven monument, 1845
Unveiling of the Beethoven monument by Ernst Julius Hähnel at the Münsterplatz in
Bonn
Before the Beethoven monument at the Münsterplatz in Bonn was officially unveiled in a ceremony on August 12th,
1845 the honorary guests, among them Queen Victoria of England, her prince consort Albert, King Friedrich
Wilhelm IV of Prussia and Franz Liszt, signed the deed of foundation. Also the members of the committee signed
the document. Like it is written in the document itself, two originals were drawn up, and having been signed,
each original was enclosed in a leaden capsule and immured at the foot of the monument. However, no such a
capsule with certificate was found when the monument's base was opened in the 1970s during construction works
for the parking garage under the Münsterplatz and the immured documents were brought to the city archive for
safekeeping.
When the Queen visited Germany the Illustrated London News published an article with pictures of the most
important sights, among them the Bonn Beethoven monument, a map of the river Rhine and genre scenes of the
journey. The same newspaper also published the original of the displayed wood engraving for the first time. The
reproduction is the cover page of a dinner menu card German Federal President Richard von Weizsäcker held in
honour of Queen Elizabeth II on July 3rd, 1986 at the Brühl Castle.
Legal notice
Publisher
Beethoven-Haus Bonn
Bonngasse 24-26
D-53111 Bonn
Germany
Texts:
Dr. Nicole Kämpken
Dr. Michael Ladenburger
This temporary exhibition was shown 22.08.2007 to 18.11.2007 in the Beethoven-Haus.